LooksCar

You will be redirected to the script in

seconds
Our TechnoLOGY. Powered by Blogger.

Featured 1

Curabitur et lectus vitae purus tincidunt laoreet sit amet ac ipsum. Proin tincidunt mattis nisi a scelerisque. Aliquam placerat dapibus eros non ullamcorper. Integer interdum ullamcorper venenatis. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas.

Featured 2

Curabitur et lectus vitae purus tincidunt laoreet sit amet ac ipsum. Proin tincidunt mattis nisi a scelerisque. Aliquam placerat dapibus eros non ullamcorper. Integer interdum ullamcorper venenatis. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas.

Featured 3

Curabitur et lectus vitae purus tincidunt laoreet sit amet ac ipsum. Proin tincidunt mattis nisi a scelerisque. Aliquam placerat dapibus eros non ullamcorper. Integer interdum ullamcorper venenatis. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas.

Featured 4

Curabitur et lectus vitae purus tincidunt laoreet sit amet ac ipsum. Proin tincidunt mattis nisi a scelerisque. Aliquam placerat dapibus eros non ullamcorper. Integer interdum ullamcorper venenatis. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas.

Featured 5

Curabitur et lectus vitae purus tincidunt laoreet sit amet ac ipsum. Proin tincidunt mattis nisi a scelerisque. Aliquam placerat dapibus eros non ullamcorper. Integer interdum ullamcorper venenatis. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas.

Showing posts with label Android. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Android. Show all posts

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Google CEO Reveals Android's Tablet Future

In Google's most recent earnings report, CEO Larry Page said of "lower priced tablets that run Android" that "we definitely have a belief that there is going to be a lot of success at the lower end of the market as well, with lower priced products that will be very significant. And it's definitely an area we think is important and are quite focused on."

Analysts like those at Droid Life believe Page was alluding to the 7-inch "Nexus tablet" that Google's reportedly working on. This piece on The Week sums up the reports, including the expected July launch date. But it's worth pointing out that the tablets at "the lower end of the market" which are currently having "a lot of success" aren't the generic-brand Target specials, or even the lowest end Samsung Galaxy Tabs. They're the Barnes and Noble Nook Color (and Nook Tablet) and Amazon's Kindle Fire, neither of which run what Page called "the full Google version of Android" but both of which have sold in the millions, and are the only "tablets" that have any mainstream mindshare or marketshare aside from Apple's iPad.

Here's a look at the reasons why, and the ways Google may be pursuing an identical strategy.

Cheaper price and smaller form factor than the iPad

This part is basically non-controversial. No $399-$499, 10-inch tablet has managed to successfully compete with the iPad, if by "successfully compete" you mean "drawn any significant percentage of buyers away from it." But the Kindle and Nook have, because they aren't just generic-brand iPads; they're iPad-like devices that less-affluent buyers can actually afford, and that people who already have an iPad can pick up in addition to it. For about the same price as an iPod Touch, you get a device with a much larger screen, that's tied into the same e-book and media store you may already use on your black-and-white e-reader.

Integrated content store

"Content" means more than just apps. It means games, music, movies, and e-books. Of the three successful tablet companies so far, all three run their own stores, and Google's rebranding of the Android Market as "Google Play" shows its desire to put a Google-owned content ecosystem at the forefront of the experience. Which means that just like how Amazon's store and the iTunes store are wired into the Kindle and iPad all over the place, the Google Play store may be too if Google can make its own tablet. Which may involve ...

A custom OS or UI skin

As Charlie Kindel opines in a blog essay, Google will abandon Android, by which he means the Android brand and "generic" Android design. Instead, something more like the Kindle Fire or Nook Color is likely, which may not even be Android branded but might be Google Play branded instead. (Too bad they can't call it the Google Play Station.)

End-to-end control of the experience

Amazon, Apple, and Barnes and Noble all control the entire official experience you have with their tablets, including the software, the hardware, and retail. (Amazon and Barnes and Noble use Google's Android code, but because it's open-source they can modify it all they want.) Now that Google's bought Motorola, expect it to start building its own tablets for this initiative; if not at first, then soon afterwards.

The biggest problem for Google, with this regard, is its lack of a retail presence. The company tried selling Nexus One phones directly from its website a couple of years ago, and didn't do all that well with it. Worse, Google Play lags behind its competitors' retail cachet as well. No one thinks of Google the same way that they do of Apple or Amazon ... but that may be exactly how Google thinks that it needs to be seen, in order to survive the decline of its search business.

View orginal artical here- Android


Late-night poll: Do you use, or want to use, the FM radio feature?

Tonight's poll comes thanks to our lovable forums Admin Cory Streater, who brought up a great question on episode 93 of the Android Central podcast -- I wonder how many people really use the FM radio? None of us were any help (we can't ever agree on anything) but you guys sure can be.

I get why people use it. It's subscription free, doesn't use data, and has a bigger selection of music that you could ever hope to have in your personal cloud or on the phone itself. Maybe the best reason I've ever heard is that it's great for listening to the news while on the treadmill at the gym. The other side of the coin -- wired headphones suck, radio stations suck, commercial music sucks, etc. People have just as many reasons why they don't use it as those who do use it.

I'm somewhere in the middle. I don't use it, but I do see the appeal. And not everything on the radio sucks. But asking you guys is a much better idea, so tell us all in the poll, and fire away in the comments to let us know why you voted the way you did.

View orginal artical here- Android

Thursday, April 12, 2012

QR Droid vs Barcode Scanner – Best code scanner app for Android

I agree that you must have your own favorites for code scanner apps for your dear android Smartphone and so have I.

So, let me compare two of the best code scanner apps for android. I’ll keep this comparison short and try to cover every aspect of both scanner apps.

QR Droid vs Barcode Scanner

File Size
QR Droid: 3.4 MB version 4.1.1 as updated on 7 December 2011.

Barcode Scanner: 589 Kb version 3.72 as updated on 11 November 2011.

Let the file size not trick you. The file sizes are different because both applications offer different features.

However, I must tell you that both apps install themselves on the SD card and some files go to your cache memory, but that is nothing to worry about.

Pick your app, if you want extremely light scanner app with limited features then go for Barcode scanner and if you want a fully featured, yet a heavy app, then go for QR Droid.
Installation and Running
You can download the app from Android Market that is linked with your account and your Smartphone will install it automatically when you are connected to the internet.

Running the apps is just a tap away (as usual). If you work with bar codes on a daily basis and have internet access then any of these apps will help you greatly when you make a purchase and aren’t sure about the product.

You can create a shortcut of both apps by tapping and holding for a little while till they appear on your home screen.

Features
I have already mentioned above that QR Droid is heavy but fully featured and Barcode Scanner is light with limited featured.

Some features include (both apps):
 Searching the scanned product on the internet (internet connectivity required).
Sharing it via email and available apps like blogger, Bluetooth, wordpress, dropbox, Gmail, evernote, google+,
translate, etc. Basically, it depends on how many apps you have that allow you to share something.
Sharing via SMS.

Exclusive Features (only QR Droid)
QR Droid has all the features of Barcode scanner and if you are not bound by little internal memory then it would be your first choice.
These screenshots will show you the options that you get with QR Droid.
Conclusion

I am sure that you have sensed my bend towards QR Droid because I am not bound by little internal storage.

I have Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830 upgraded to Gingerbread 2.3.4 and it has 150 MB of internal memory. It is not a lot but it is enough to hold some of the essential files that need to be copied on the phone memory after SD card.

I find QR Droid to be very helpful when I need to create QR Codes. As a matter of fact, I love both apps.

Barcode Scanner is simple and fast and it takes only a couple of seconds to learn the details of the products that I scanned.

Barcode Scanner doesn’t offer you a lot of interface or even settings for that matter. So, for people who like really (really) simple apps, this app would be just great.

QR Droid offers great set of settings and you can set it to run like Barcode Scanner as well. I mean that, just like Barcode Scanner’s first step is to scan the code as soon as you tap the app, you can also make this as a default step of QR Droid.

I would recommend you to install both apps and have best of both worlds. However, rest is yours to decide and pick what works best for you.

View orginal artical here- Android


Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Sony to Introduce Android 4.0 Upgrade Next Month

Sony has now officially announced that it plans to introduce the Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich OS version upgrade for some of its select smartphones, starting as early as next month. The devices receiving this upgrade would include the Xperia arc S,Xperia neo V and Xperia ray in mid-April. This upgrade rollout, Sony mentioned, would take place gradually and would take about 3 to 4 weeks to complete the process.

Sony further mentioned that this upgrade would not be available over-the-air as is been the case most of the time with other upgrades. In order to install the said upgrade, hence, users would have to use their PC or Mac and then connect their device to transfer the entire process. It is expected that the Xperia PLAY, Xperia mini, Xperia mini pro, Xperia pro and some other smartphone would receive their upgrades by the end of May or in early June this year.
I personally am very excited about this latest announcement from Sony. The Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, which is filled with many features and functionalities, is now long overdue. I suppose there will be a large number of Sony Xperia users who will be awaiting this release with bated breath as well.

The exact date of availability of this software upgrade will depend upon the specific Xperia model and also on the market location and carrier specifications in that particular location.

View orginal artical here- Android

Android this week: Nexus tablet confirmed; Galaxy Note sales; Use fewer bits when browsing

The rumors of a Google Nexus tablet took another step towards reality this week, with a Wall Street Journal report confirming Google’s plans. The idea is for Google to try a direct to consumer sales model for the second time; it tried this in 2010 with the Nexus One, but the concept didn’t change the way consumers buy phones as Google had hoped. There’s a key difference this time, however, as Sascha Segan correctly points out at PC Magazine: Carriers won’t be involved.

Instead, Google will sell the tablets over the web and ship them to buyers; end of process. With the Nexus One, carriers had to be involved to some degree as the phone would be using the carrier networks and need a carrier plan. A Google Nexus tablet, however, would likely be a Wi-Fi only device, so the customer relationship would be directly between Google and the end users. Google doesn’t even need to rely on the web only as it could sell its tablet through retail stores such as Target, WalMart, BestBuy and others, just as Amazon does with its Kindle devices.
So it’s a safe bet that this tablet won’t have cellular capabilities. That will help keep costs down for the devices, expected to be built first by Asus, and later by Samsung. If the tablet isn’t exactly like the Asus MeMo slate shown off at CES — with a reported price of $249 — it should be similar. I’d expect at least  a dual-core processor (the MeMo will use a quad-core chip), 7-inch display, limited internal memory — say 8- or 16 GB — with microSD expansion, Android 4.0 software, front and rear cameras, plus support for high-definition output on large screens. That could sway some away from a Kindle Fire, especially if priced at $199 or less, although Amazon’s simple interface and wider range of digital content could still challenge sales.

One device that isn’t challenged of late is the Samsung Galaxy Note; even with the “dreaded” stylus, Samsung has sold 5 million of the large phone / small tablet devices. The 5.3-inch handset is likely picking up momentum overseas as AT&T has only sold the device in the U.S. for the past 6 weeks. Samsung is wisely looking to the stylus as a way to stand apart from the crowded sea of Android phones. The company has already announced that when it upgrades the Galaxy Note to Android 4.0 in the next three months, it will add more software functions that use the stylus.
Whether or not your Android phone has a stylus, you can now cut down on your data usage when browsing: Opera release the final version of its Opera Mini 7 browser this week and it’s an excellent way to quickly browse on the cheap. Opera claims up to a 90 percent data savings when using Opera Mini because the company compresses information and pictures from websites and the delivers the content. This happens in milliseconds, so there’s no real delay in the experience, although you are providing Opera with your browsing history as a result. I use Opera Mini as a two-browser strategy: For basic short bursts of using the web, I’ll hit Opera Mini. When I’m consumer large amounts of video or other content, I reach for Chrome on my Android 4.0 device.

View orginal article here-Android